From f.j.wright at live.co.uk Thu Apr 1 18:00:18 2021 From: f.j.wright at live.co.uk (Francis Wright) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:00:18 +0000 Subject: [tex4ht] Problem using mjcli on Cygwin In-Reply-To: References: <20210330190349.t3kgfhzvqm2nymtd@agraulos> Message-ID: Thanks. Removing the mathjax option does indeed remove the two redundant script elements relating to MathJax from the output HTML files, although using MathML seems to cause other problems that I need to investigate further. Best wishes, Francis -----Original Message----- From: Michal Hoftich Sent: Wednesday, 31 March 2021 9:59 pm To: Francis Wright Cc: tex4ht at tug.org Subject: Re: [tex4ht] Problem using mjcli on Cygwin You don't need to use the "mathjax" option with mjcli extension, it loads the necessary code automatically, but without the JavaScript inclusion. Best regards, Michal From michal.h21 at gmail.com Thu Apr 1 19:16:58 2021 From: michal.h21 at gmail.com (Michal Hoftich) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 19:16:58 +0200 Subject: [tex4ht] Problem using mjcli on Cygwin In-Reply-To: References: <20210330190349.t3kgfhzvqm2nymtd@agraulos> Message-ID: <20210401171658.ubxysihh2av3ha7e@agraulos> What problems do happen? MathML shouldn't be used unless you explicitly use the "mathml" option. There are some notorious issues with sub and super scripts with the MathML option, TeX4ht needs to enclose the base and exponent in {} in order to work correctly, for example. I am sure there are many more problems. Best regards, Michal >Thanks. Removing the mathjax option does indeed remove the two >redundant script elements relating to MathJax from the output HTML >files, although using MathML seems to cause other problems that I need >to investigate further. > >Best wishes, Francis > From f.j.wright at live.co.uk Fri Apr 2 17:17:46 2021 From: f.j.wright at live.co.uk (Francis Wright) Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 15:17:46 +0000 Subject: [tex4ht] Problem using mjcli on Cygwin In-Reply-To: <20210401171658.ubxysihh2av3ha7e@agraulos> References: <20210330190349.t3kgfhzvqm2nymtd@agraulos> <20210401171658.ubxysihh2av3ha7e@agraulos> Message-ID: Dear Michal, I didn't explicitly use the "mathml" option. I wanted to use LaTeX input to MathJax (because I've had problems with the MathML generated by TeX4ht before), so I originally used the mathjax option, but that included MathJax