Some comments on CTAN:info/tdscd
Sebastian Rahtz
TWG-TDS@SHSU.edu
Mon, 26 Feb 1996 12:58:34 GMT
> the texi2html documentation to ensure that filenames remain uniqiue
> when truncated to 8+3. While I was at it I also regenerated all the
> Info files for the same reason. Expect my uploads at ftp.tex.ac.uk.
you are a hero.
> 2. I had a look at the files you placed on CTAN:info/tdscd and noted
> the following problems (some of this may be TDS releveant but most
i wont comment on all, but thank you very much for looking at this,
its really very helpful.
> > /teTeX/texmf/bibtex/bib:
> > README
> > harvard
> >
> Where's mrabbrev.bib (from AMS-LaTeX)?
> Where's xampl.bib (from BibTeX)?
good point. i had forgotten both
> Should be texmf/doc/generic/babel according to TDS.
>
> > /teTeX/texmf/doc/dc:
>
> Should be texmf/doc/fonts/dc. In fact, that directory already exists,
> but the contents is slightly different. So what's messed up here?
me and Thomas at different times
> > /teTeX/texmf/doc/latex/base:
> > 00readme.txt
> > Makefile.unx
> > alltt.dtx
> > alltt.ins
> [...]
>
> What are all the .dtx and .ins files doing here? Doesn't the TDS
> say explicitly that thex belong into texmf/source/latex/base:
yes, my mistake. many of the same kind to undo
> > /teTeX/texmf/doc/latex/revtex:
>
> This looks incomplete. There should be DVI files for all
> man*.tex files, but there's probably no need for PS files.
yes, that was half-finished.
> > /teTeX/texmf/fonts/tfm:
> [...]
> > bitstrea
> > bitstream
an interesting question....
> > dctt2074.tfm
> > dctt2488.tfm
> > jknappen
> > monotype
>
> Something must have been screwed up here!
indeed...
> TDS says "texmf/source" (without trailing `s')! Here's where I would
> expect to see a lot of stuff in texmf/source/{generic,latex}/<package>/...
> In fact, you might put all the teTeX/extra-distrib stuff from CTAN here.
Thomas and I talked about whether to include .tar.gz packages of what
we build the TDS tree from, but it would cut down on the CD
space. that extra-distrib is my working area
> What's this doing here? "texmf/tex/initex" has been gone long since.
> This stuff obviously belongs into texmf/tex/latex209/base/...
yup, all a mess, to reo
> set up texmf.cnf, so that format files by default will also be searched
> in the corresponding directory on disk, no just on the CD.
thats true; it isnt set up in texmf.cnf as its stands; will add
> 1. I would find the output of "find /teTeX -print | sort" easier
> to check than the output of "ls -R /teTeX".
ok
> 2. If time permits in the production cycle, it might be a good idea
> to have someone (us?) check the contents of a preliminary CD
> for problems, mismatches, mix-ups, etc. as mentioned above before
> releasing it to the general public.
oh yes, definitely! i have sent a preliminary CD to Thomas already (he
has done revised Make* scripts etc), and i propose in (say) a month to
make 3 or 4 and send out real CDs to people with some time and energy
to look at for a few weeks, as well as posting the list to CTAN. i
have got a supplier yet, but i would guess i'll need to get the final
product to them by the first week of May to be on the safe side.
> What about including other related software such as Acrobat readers
i am planning to check Acrobat with Adobe.
> or WWW brosers for those Unix platforms where they are available?
since we do not include GhostScript, isnt this a bit over the top?
but the short answer is that if someone puts together a tar.gz file,
claims responsibility for it, tests it, and it doesnt break anything
else, why not? but i'd be very reluctant to have only partial bin/
support - it would be sad to say "this CD is fully populated only for
linux and solaris". also, its a slippery slope. why not add gzip,
unzip, netpbm, perl....
sebastian